Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

In re Glatt Air Techniques, Inc., 10-1141

By FindLaw Staff on January 05, 2011 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Finding of obviousness of a patent related to a coating apparatus reversed

In re Glatt Air Techniques, Inc., 10-1141, concerned a challenge to the final decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) holding claim 5 of a patent, related to a coating apparatus known as a Wurster coater used to coat particles, such as pharmaceutical ingredients, unpatentable for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. section 103(a).  In reversing, the court held that, because substantial evidence does not support the Board's finding that a prior art expressly or implicitly teaches using an air wall to shield particles from entering the initial spray pattern, the Board has not made a proper prima facie case of obviousness.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard