Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

In re Lister, No. 09-1060

By FindLaw Staff on September 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Decision of the PTO affirming the examiner's rejection of petitioner's claims of his application involving a manuscript for playing golf is vacated and remanded as the record does not contain sufficient evidence that the prior art reference relied upon by the Board was publicly accessible more than one year prior to the date on which the petitioner filed his patent application.     

Read In re Lister, No. 09-1060

Appellate Information

Appeal from:  United States Patent and Trademark Office Board od Patent Appeals and Interferences

Decided September 22, 2009


Before Gajarsa, Linn, and Prost, Circuit Judges. 
Opinion by Prost, Circuit Judge.   


For Appellant:  Peter M. Midgley, Jr., Zarian Midgley & Johnson PLLLC, Rexford A. Johnson

For Appellee:  Joseph G. Piccolo, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, and Raymond T. Chen, Benjamin D.M. Wood

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard