Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

In re McNeil-PPC, Inc., No. 08-1546

By FindLaw Staff on July 31, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a patent application dispute involving tampon design, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences judgment is reversed where: 1) plaintiff's appeal is timely; 2) the Board's rejection of claim 1 of the patent as anticipated, because another unexamined application discloses a tampon with the characteristics claimed by plaintiff, lacks substantial evidentiary support.    

Read In re McNeil-PPC, Inc., No. 08-1546

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
Decided: July 31, 2009

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Chief Judge MICHEL.
Circuit Judge DYK dissents.

For Appellant: Dianne B. Elderkin, Woodcock Washburn, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

For Respondent: Christina J. Hieber, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard