Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In a patent application dispute involving tampon design, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences judgment is reversed where: 1) plaintiff's appeal is timely; 2) the Board's rejection of claim 1 of the patent as anticipated, because another unexamined application discloses a tampon with the characteristics claimed by plaintiff, lacks substantial evidentiary support.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
Decided: July 31, 2009
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Chief Judge MICHEL.
Circuit Judge DYK dissents.
For Respondent: Christina J. Hieber, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: