Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Int'l Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp., No. 09-1237

By FindLaw Staff on December 17, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's design patent suit against Walgreens and another defendant involving shoes typically referred to as "clogs", district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in finding that the claims of the asserted patents were invalid as anticipated by a patent assigned to Crocs, Inc. is affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded as, although district court correctly held that the ordinary observer test is the sole test of invalidity, it erred, however, in failing to compare the insole patterns in plaintiff's patented designs to the prior art as part of an overall comparison of the designs.   

Read Int'l Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp., No. 09-1237

Appellate Information

Appeal from:  United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Decided December 17, 2009


Before:  Bryson,   Clevenger, and Dyk,  Circuit Judges

Opinion by Dyk, Circuit Judge


For Appellant:   George L. Pinchak, Tarolli Sundhein Covell & Tummino LLP

For Appellee:    Mark P. Walters, Darby & Darby PC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard