Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Koninklijke Philips Elec., N.V. v. Cardiac Sci. Operating Co., No. 09-1241

By FindLaw Staff on January 05, 2010 12:20 PM

In a patent infringement suit involving a cardiac defibrillator, district court's sua sponte dismissal of plaintiff-Philips' suit against the defendant is reversed and remanded where: 1) the district court ignored plaintiff's request to present new evidence and never heard its argument that its patent had priority, the court did not give plaintiff a full and fair opportunity to ventilate the issues raided in its complaint and improperly entered summary judgment under Ninth Circuit law, and because the parties genuinely disputed issues of material fact as to written description and anticipation; and 2) the district court erred in holding that the Board can apply 37 C.F.R. section 41.200(b) and disregard the original disclosure when a patentee challenges an applicant's written description in an interference proceeding.   

Read Koninklijke Philips Elec., N.V. v. Cardiac Sci. Operating Co., No. 09-1241

Appellate Information

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Decided January 5, 2010


Before:  Michel, Chief Judge, and Friedman and Gajarsa, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Gajarsa, Circuit Judge


For Appellant:  J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP

For Appellee:   Eric H. Chadwick, Patterson Thuente Skaar & Christensen, PA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard