Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Salman Ranch Ltd. v. US, No. 08-5053

By FindLaw Staff on July 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving a Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment issued by the IRS, Court of Federal Claims judgment is reversed where the court erred in holding that the IRS was entitled to the benefit of the six-year statute of limitations under I.R.C. sec. 6501(e)(1)(A), as the alleged overstatement of the basis of the property in question by plaintiff did not constitute an omission from gross income under the statute. Accordingly, the three-year limitations period of the statute controls, and the Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment is untimely, and therefore invalid.    

Read Salman Ranch Ltd. v. US, No. 08-5053

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Decided: July 30, 2009

Before NEWMAN and SCHALL, Circuit Judges, and PATEL, District Judge.
Opinion by SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN

For Plaintiff: Alan Poe, Holland & Hart LLP, Greenwood Village, Colorado.

For Defendant: Joan I. Oppenheimer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, Dc.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard