Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Wavetronix v. EIS Electronic Integrated Sys., No. 08-1129

By FindLaw Staff on July 29, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a patent infringement action involving systems for monitoring the flow of automobile traffic on thoroughfares, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) defendant's monitoring device does not practice the "defining traffic lanes" step of the disputed claim and therefore does not literally infringe plaintiff's patent; and 2) plaintiff's infringement by equivalents claim fails, as the manner in which defendant's monitoring device defines lanes is much different than the patented invention.    

Read Wavetronix v. EIS Electronic Integrated Sys., No. 08-1129

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah.
Decided July 29, 2009

Before NEWMAN and SCHALL, Circuit Judges, and PATEL, District Judge.
Opinion by PATEL, District Judge

For Plaintiff: Brent P. Lorimer, Workman Nydegger, Salt Lake City, Utah.

For Defendant: Richard D. Rochford, Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester, New York.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard