Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Wedgetail, Ltd. v. Huddleston Deluxe, Inc., No. 09-1045

By FindLaw Staff on August 12, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute over attorney's fees in a patent infringement action, the district court's decision not to award attorney's fees is affirmed where: 1) nothing in the record compels a finding of exceptionality or otherwise suggests a need for the district court to provide its reasoning, and thus the lack of detailed analysis by the court does not warrant reversal; and 2) the court did not err in failing to entertain a motion for attorney's fees, and any error that did occur was harmless.    

Read Wedgetail, Ltd. v. Huddleston Deluxe, Inc., No. 09-1045

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Decided August 12, 2009

Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

For Plaintiff: Andy Tindel, Provost Umphrey Law Firm, LLP, Tyler, Texas.

For Defendant: Marc M. Gorelnik, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, San Francisco, California.  

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard