Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Guided Legal Forms & Services: Sign In

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Crosby v. La. Health Serv. & Indemn. Co., No. 10-30043

By FindLaw Staff on December 30, 2010 8:41 PM

ERISA Health Care Benefits Action

In Crosby v. La. Health Serv. & Indemn. Co., No. 10-30043, an Employee Retirement Income Security Act action to recover denied health care benefits, the court vacated summary judgment for defendants where the district court denied plaintiff's motion to compel based on an erroneous view of the scope of admissible and discoverable evidence in ERISA actions.

  • As the court wrote:  "Appellant Jete Crosby appeals the district court's summary judgment on her Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) claim to recover denied health care benefits and the magistrate judge's decision to limit discovery. The challenges raised by Crosby require us to determine the scope of admissible evidence and permissible discovery in an ERISA action to recover benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B)."

    Related Resources

    You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

    Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

    Or contact an attorney near you:
    Copied to clipboard