Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action alleging that certain casino companies violated the Sherman Act by dividing the Louisiana casino market and by monopolizing, attempting to monopolize, and conspiring to monopolize that market, judgment on the pleadings for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff allegedly suffered injury only as a would-be competitor, and thus failed to allege antitrust injury.
Filed October 30, 2009
Opinion by Judge Jones
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.