Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action alleging that certain casino companies violated the Sherman Act by dividing the Louisiana casino market and by monopolizing, attempting to monopolize, and conspiring to monopolize that market, judgment on the pleadings for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff allegedly suffered injury only as a would-be competitor, and thus failed to allege antitrust injury.
Read Jebaco Inc. v. Harrah's Operating Co., No. 08-30289
Appellate Information
Filed October 30, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Jones
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: