Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Keenan v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., No. 09-30102

By FindLaw Staff on July 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a breach of contract dispute involving the extension of a credit facility, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed in part where Defendants owed no fiduciary duty to Plaintiff; but reversed in part, where Plaintiff's detrimental reliance and promissory estoppel claims derived from a breach of promise rather than a breach of duty, and thus were not barred by the statute of limitations.

Read Keenan v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., No. 09-30102

Appellate Information

Filed July 9, 2009


Opinion by Judge Haynes

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard