Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Matthis v. Cain, No. 09-30576

By FindLaw Staff on December 14, 2010 2:34 PM

Dismissal of Habeas Petition as Untimely Affirmed

In Matthis v. Cain, No. 09-30576, a second-degree murder prosecution, the court affirmed the dismissal of petitioner's habeas petition as untimely where, because the overturning and reinstatement of petitioner's conviction occurred solely through post-conviction review, this did not affect the date his conviction became final under direct review and thus his federal habeas petition was untimely.

 

As the court wrote:  "Jason Matthis ("Appellant") appeals the district court's dismissal of his
habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as untimely. The district court found that Appellant's petition was time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The court held that Appellant exceeded the limitations period because he filed his federal habeas petition more than one year after the date his state conviction became final by conclusion of direct review, notwithstanding tolling of the limitations period during the pendency of his state post-conviction review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2)."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard