Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action seeking to foreclose on plaintiff's security interests in loan collateral, district court's order allowing the foreclosure is affirmed where: 1) collateral estoppel precluded defendants from raising the statute of limitations; 2) plaintiff would be prejudiced by a subrogation that would allow one defendant to compete on an equal or superior footing for the secured interest in the irrigation equipment at issue; and 3) plaintiff was entitled to attorney's fees under the debt contracts between the parties.
Filed September 22, 2009
Opinion by Judge Jones
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.