Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's sentence for illegal reentry into the U.S. after deportation is affirmed where the application of the 2008 Sentencing Guidelines to defendant was not a plain-error violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause because case law revealed a reasonable dispute regarding the ex post facto implications of retroactive application of the advisory guidelines.
Read US v. Castillo-Estevez, No. 09-40096
Appellate Information
Filed February 9, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Jones
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: