Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Fisher, No. 10-30424

By FindLaw Staff on October 27, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Reversal of Denial of Motion to Dismiss Indictment

In US v. Fisher, No. 10-30424, a drug prosecution, the court reversed the district court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on double-jeopardy grounds, holding that the government did not show -- nor did the record show -- that the district court carefully considered reasonable alternatives before declaring a mistrial.


As the court wrote:  "This appeal arises out of a mistrial that the district court declared sua
sponte after two essential prosecution witnesses became unavailable to testify as scheduled. The record demonstrates that there was no manifest necessity for the mistrial. Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court's denial of Fisher's motion to dismiss the indictment on double-jeopardy grounds and we render a judgment of dismissal."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard