Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Jang, No. 08-10616

By FindLaw Staff on June 30, 2009 5:59 PM

The revocation of Defendant's supervised release, based on his violation of a condition of his release by providing misleading answers to questions posed by a Korean consulate, is affirmed where the District Court could reasonably have concluded that Defendant made the statements with the intent to hinder his departure.

Read US v. Jang, No. 08-10616

Appellate Information

Filed June 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Haynes

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard