Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In a dispute over a trademark relating to eyelash extension products, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) the trademark at issue arguably had many of the indicia of a suggestive mark and was therefore entitled to protection; and 2) plaintiffs showed several incidences of actual confusion.
Read Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., No. 08-20578
Appellate Information
Filed July 15, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge DeMoss
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: