Content For YouCivil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., No. 08-20578
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="600" height="300"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In a dispute over a trademark relating to eyelash extension products, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) the trademark at issue arguably had many of the indicia of a suggestive mark and was therefore entitled to protection; and 2) plaintiffs showed several incidences of actual confusion.
Read Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., No. 08-20578
Appellate Information
Filed July 15, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge DeMoss
