Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Analysis Group, Inc. v. Cent. Florida Inv., Inc., 09-2630

By FindLaw Staff on December 09, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Suit for breach of oral contract to pay for expert's expedited services

Analysis Group, Inc. v. Cent. Florida Inv., Inc., 09-2630, concerned a challenge to the district court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff, in plaintiff's breach of oral contract claim against a defendant for failure to pay for an expert's expedited services in an underlying litigation.

In affirming, the court held that the jury instructions do not entitle defendant to judgment as a matter of law or a new trial.  The court also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest as the requirements of the Massachusetts prejudgment interest statute have been satisfied.  Lastly, the court held that the plaintiff's motion for sanctions on the basis that defendant's appeal is groundless and intentionally misleading is denied as, although defendant's appeal fails, it was neither frivolous nor an unreasonable or vexatious multiplication of proceedings.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard