Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Young v. Murphy, 09-1685

By FindLaw Staff on August 10, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Young v. Murphy, 09-1685, concerned a challenge to the district court's denial of defendant's petition for habeas relief, from his civil commitment to the Massachusetts Treatment Center pursuant to Chapter 123A of the Massachusetts General Laws, after a state court jury found that he was a sexually dangerous person.

In affirming, the court held that the district court did not unreasonably apply Supreme Court precedent when it refused to credit defendant's categorical claim that a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder (ADP) can never serve as a sufficient basis for civil commitment because the disorder does not affect volition and is so prevalent among criminal offenders that it cannot be used to distinguish ordinary recidivists from the dangerously mentally ill.  The court also held that the Massachusetts Court of Appeals did not unreasonably apply Supreme Court precedent in rejecting defendant's argument that the record does not establish that APD causes him serious difficulty in controlling his sexual impulses.

Related Resource:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard