Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Denial of Motion to Suppress Evidence of Drugs from Sobriety Checkpoint

By FindLaw Staff on April 22, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In US v. William, No. 08-2303, the First Circuit faced a challenge to a conviction for possessing marijuana and crack cocaine, arising from a brief traffic stop at a sobriety checkpoint.  The court affirmed the conviction and rejected defendant's claim that the stop was unlawful because the checkpoint's primary purpose was something other than detecting impaired drivers. 

However, defendant's sentence is vacated and remanded for resentencing as the sentencing provision applied in this case - a five-year minimum and a twenty-year maximum - required not only more than three grams of crack cocaine, but also a prior conviction under 21 U.S.C. section 844(a).  Here, defendant's prior conviction was for a state drug offense and does not meet the requirements of section 844(a) for a sentence above two years. 

Related Resources:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard