Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Estrada v. State of Rhode Island, No. 09-1149

By FindLaw Staff on February 04, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiffs' action challenging the constitutionality of the actions of a police officer during a traffic stop, summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where: 1) the officer is entitled to federal and state qualified immunity for any possible constitutional violations that he may have committed in asking the van's passengers questions about their immigration status and in contacting ICE; 2) the officer is entitled to qualified immunity for alleged violations of state or federal laws surrounding the seizure of plaintiffs and their subsequent escort to ICE office; 3) officer is entitled to qualified immunity for both pat down searches under federal and state law; and 4) the officer is entitled to qualified immunity for all of the challenged actions with respect to the Rhode Island Racial Profiling Prevention Act. 

Read Estrada v. State of Rhode Island, No. 09-1149

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided February 4, 2010


Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge, Torruella and Howard, Circuit Judges

Opinion by  Circuit Judge Torruella


For Appellant:    V. Edward Formisano, American Civil Liberties Union, Rhode Island Affiliate, Sinapi, Formisano, & Co., Ltd.,

For Appellee:    John M. Moreira, Special Assistant Attorney General, Patrick C. Lynch, Attorney General, James R. Lee and Brenda D. Baum, Assistants Attorney General

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard