Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Janosky v. St. Amand , No. 09-1012

By FindLaw Staff on February 03, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's denial of defendant's petition for habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) defendant is barred from litigating his procedurally defaulted jury instruction claim; 2) defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is rejected; and 3) defendant did not present his Sixth Amendment claim, the scrap of paper, fairly and recognizably to the state trial court.  

Read Janosky v. St. Amand , No. 09-1012

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 2010


Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge, Stahl, and Seyla, Circuit Judges

Opinion by  Circuit Judge Seyla


For Appellant:  Francis J. Hurley, Gannon & Hurley, P.C.

For Appellee:    Anne M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Martha Coakley, Attorney General,

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard