Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Lopez v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, No. 09-1664

By FindLaw Staff on December 04, 2009 8:06 AM

In minority police officers' disparate impact race claim under Title VII against a state agency that prepares and administers promotional examinations for local police officers under the state civil service system, their employers, various cities, and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), district court's denial of Eleventh Amendment immunity for the state defendants, the state of Massachusetts and a chief human resources officers of the Human Resources Division (HRD) in his official capacity, is reversed where: 1) the state defendants do not qualify as employers as that term is used in Title VII; 2) HRD cannot be deemed plaintiffs' de facto employer as it exercised no control, direct or indirect, over the factors relevant to the common law agency test; and 3) plaintiffs' alternate theories why HRD should be considered their employer under Title VII are rejected.    

Read Lopez v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, No. 09-1664

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 3, 2009


Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge, Torruella and Howard, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Lynch, Chief Judge


For Appellant:   Sookyoung Shin, Assistant Attorney General, Robert L. Quinan, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts

For Appellee:  Harold Lichten, Leah Berrault and Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard