Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Medina v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 08-2564

By FindLaw Staff on November 25, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's ERISA suit against the defendant alleging that it used an arbitrary and capricious procedure in terminating his short-term disability benefits and refusing to grant him long-term disability benefits, entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where: 1) defendant did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's claim for short-term disability benefits; 2) district court did not err in dismissing plaintiff's claim for long-term disability benefits as he had not exhausted his administrative remedies; 3) plaintiff's claim that defendant is liable for sanctions is rejected; and 4) district court did not err in not awarding plaintiff attorney's fees as he does not prevail on any of his substantive claims.   

Read Medina v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 08-2564

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico

Decided November 23, 2009


Before:  Lipez, Torruella, and Howard, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Howard, Circuit Judge


For Appellant:   Sonia B. Alfaro de la Vega with whom Alfaro Alfaro & Acevedo-Carlson

For Appellee:   Frank Gotay-Barquet with whom Gotay & Pérez, P.S.C.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard