Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In plaintiff-wireless carrier's case against a city, the city's zoning board, and some of its members for denying a variance and special use permit to build a wireless communications tower in the city, district court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff is affirmed as the zoning board's decision was a final action for purposes of section 332(c)(7)(B) of the Telecommunications Act, and as such, the court did not err in finding that the zoning board's decision had the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Decided November 3, 2009
Opinion by Lynch, Chief Judge
For Appellant: Jeffrey S. Michaelson, Michaelson & Michaelson
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.