Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. City of Cranston, No. 08-2491

By FindLaw Staff on November 03, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff-wireless carrier's case against a city, the city's zoning board, and some of its members for denying a variance and special use permit to build a wireless communications tower in the city, district court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff is affirmed as the zoning board's decision was a final action for purposes of section 332(c)(7)(B) of the Telecommunications Act, and as such, the court did not err in finding that the zoning board's decision had the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.   

Read Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. City of Cranston, No. 08-2491

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided November 3, 2009


Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge, and Gajarsa and Lipez, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Lynch, Chief Judge


For Appellant:  Jeffrey S. Michaelson, Michaelson & Michaelson

For Appellee:   William A. Worth, Thomas M. Elcock and Prince, Lobel, Glovsky & Tye LLP

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard