Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Rederford v. US Airways, Inc., No. 09-1005

By FindLaw Staff on December 14, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action  brought against an airline by a former employee alleging that the termination of her employment violated her rights under the ADA because she was suffering from lupus, dismissal of the action is affirmed where: 1) an injunction is effective to bar plaintiff's claims as she failed to pursue her employment discrimination claims through the bankruptcy proceeding; and 2) the district court did not err in rejecting plaintiff's contention that she nonetheless should be able to litigate her claims based on the doctrines of judicial estoppel and unclean hands. 

Read Rederford v. US Airways, Inc., No. 09-1005

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided December 14, 2009


Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge, Boudin, Circuit Judge, and Saylor, DIstrict Judge

Opinion by Lynch, Chief, Judge


For Appellant: Howard Moore, Jr., Moore & Moore

For Appellee:    Daniel E. Farrington, The Farrington Law Firm, LLC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard