Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Richardson v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., No. 08-2423

By FindLaw Staff on February 05, 2010 4:07 PM

In plaintiff's action against her former employer claiming discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Maine Human Rights Act by failing to accommodate her disability and by terminating her employment because of the disability, judgment in favor of defendant-employer is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that she is a "qualified individual" within the meaning of the ADA; and 2) plaintiff's interactive process claim fails as the two accommodations she identified are, on the record, inadequate to enable her to perform a sufficiently broad range of manual tasks and unreasonable as a matter of law.  

Read Richardson v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., No. 08-2423

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine

Decided February 5, 2010

Judges

Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge,Ebel and Lipez, Circuit Judges

Opinion by  Circuit Judge Lipez

Counsel

For Appellant:  Julie D. Farr

For Appellee:    Christopher T. Vrountas

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard