Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Saysana v. Gillen, No. 09-1179

By FindLaw Staff on December 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Grant of a Laotian immigrant-petitioner's request for habeas relief after being taken into custody by the ICE without bond and conclusion that BIA had misinterpreted 8 U.S.C. section 1226 are affirmed as the government has adopted an interpretation contrary to the plain meaning of the statute and in the alternative, even if the statute were ambiguous, the position of the government is not a reasonable one.     

Read Saysana v. Gillen, No. 09-1179

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 22, 2009


Before:  Howard, Ripple, and Seyla, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Ripple, Circuit Judge


For Appellant:    Theodore W. Atkinson, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration

For Appellee:     Kerry E. Doyle, Graves & Doyle, Jeanette Kain, and Kaplan, O'Sullivan & Friedman

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard