Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In a dispute involving the disenfranchisement of incarcerated felons and the Voting Rights Act, district court judgment is reversed in part and affirmed in part where: 1) plaintiffs' challenge to the statute should be dismissed as plaintiffs failed to state a claim under Voting Rights Act sec. 2, and it is clear from the language, history, and context of the Act that Congress never intended sec. 2 to prohibit the states from disenfranchising currently incarcerated felons; and 2) the court properly granted summary judgment on plaintiff's Ex Post Facto claim as the disputed state statute is a civil regulatory scheme.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Decided: July 31, 2009
Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Torruella and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Lynch, Chief Judge.
For Appellant: Kenneth W. Salinger, Assistant Attorney General.
For Appellee: Christopher P. Silva.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: