Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Tasker v. DHL Ret. Sav Plan, 09-2661

By FindLaw Staff on October 06, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Tasker v. DHL Ret. Sav Plan, 09-2661, concerned a challenge to the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's claim, in plaintiff's ERISA suit claiming that defendants violated the anti-cutback rule when they eliminated his unexercised option to transfer funds from his profit-sharing plan account to his retirement plan.

In affirming the dismissal, the court held that the unambiguous language of the regulation, section 1.411(d)-4, Q&A(b)(2)(viii),  allowed the defendants to eliminate the transfer option.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard