US v. Chaney, No. 08-2089
District court's grant of defendant's motion to suppress majority of the evidence on grounds of Fourth Amendment violation is reversed as the officer's original request for defendant's identification and the first few follow-up questions did not unreasonably extend the duration of the stop and were justified based on officer safety concerns.
Read US v. Chaney, No. 08-2089
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Decided October 15, 2009
Before: Howard, Gibson, and Boudin, Circuit Judges
Opinion by: Gibson, Circuit Judge
For Appellant: William E. Morse
For Appellee: Robert Herrick
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.