Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Dyer, No. 08-1343

By FindLaw Staff on December 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence on a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly interpreted the trafficking cross-reference under U.S.S.G. section 2G2.4(c)(2) to include situations in which a defendant intended to exchange child pornography without any commercial purpose; 2) defendant's argument that the government must necessarily show the defendant actively and subjectively desired that others would get images of child pornography from him and that ordinary general intent does not suffice is rejected; 3) district court did not err in concluding that defendant's online conduct showed an "intent to traffic" under section 2G2.4(c)(2); and 4) defendant's argument that agent's testimony violated his Confrontation Clause rights because the grand jury testimony was never part of the record and because he had no chance to challenge that testimony during the sentencing hearing is rejected as without merit.     

Read US v. Dyer, No. 08-1343

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine

Decided December 28, 2009


Before:  Lynch, Chief Judge, Torruella and Ripple, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Lynch, Chief Judge


For Appellant:  William S. Maddox

For Appellee:      Renée M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorney, Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard