Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Eisom, No. 08-1893

By FindLaw Staff on November 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's imposition of a sentence based on calculation of the guideline range to include, as relevant conduct, amounts of drugs and cash independently seized from defendant in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation is affirmed as the defendant waived any objection to the sentencing determination, and the determination was not clearly erroneous. 

Read US v. Eisom, No. 08-1893

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine

Decided November 5, 2009

Judges

Before:  Boudin, Seyla and Lipez, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Seyla, Circuit Judge

Counsel

For Appellant:  Christine M. Charles

For Appellee:  Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard