Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Merlino, No. 02-1712

By FindLaw Staff on January 20, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a prosecution of a defendant for violating the Hobbs Act and for carrying firearms in relation to a crime of violence after the FBI foiled a planned robbery of the Loomis Fargo armored car facility, district court's judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded where: 1) district court's determination that defendant made the decision not to testify was not clearly erroneous; 2) given the significant downward adjustments, coupled with its refusal to depart further despite its authority to do so, defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability that the district court would give him a lesser sentence; 3) district court's grant of a judgment of acquittal for carrying an explosive grenade is reversed as co-defendants' testimony was sufficient to establish that it was reasonably foreseeable to defendant that one of his co-conspirators would be carrying a hand grenade; and 4) district court abused its discretion in granting defendant's motion for a new trial on the explosive grenade conviction.       

Read US v. Merlino, No. 02-1712

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided January 15, 2010


Before:  Lipez, Hansen, and Howard,  Circuit Judges

Opinion:  Hansen, Circuit Judge


For Appellant:   Judith H. Mizner

For Appellee:     John-Alex Romano, Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard