Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In condemnation proceedings involving a 34 acre parcel used by the Federal Aviation Administration for aircraft navigation, the district court's judgment is affirmed where the district court: 1) did not abuse its discretion in excluding defendant's own testimony when the court had excluded similar testimony by defendant's expert; 2) did not err in holding that the "before and after" method was appropriate in valuing the property, assuming a partial taking; and 3) did not err in submitting to the jury unity of use. Defendant's remaining contentions were without merit.
Read US v. Piza-Blondet, No. 08-2263
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Decided September 11, 2009
Judges
Before: Boudin, Seyla, and Dyk, Circuit Judges.
Opinion: Dyk, Circuit Judge
Counsel
For Appellant: Paul E. Harrison, Francisco Diez and J. Wayne Mumphrey.
For Appellee: Aaron P. Avila, Attorney, U.S. Dep't of Justice, John C. Cruden, Acting Assistant Attorney General and Jeffrey M. Tapick, Attorney, U.S. Dep't of Justice.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: