Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Rodrigeuz-Barrios, No. 07-1854

By FindLaw Staff on July 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction for committing a carjacking resulting in death is affirmed where: 1) the court properly denied defendant's motion for acquittal as the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to conclude that defendant had the intent to kill or seriously harm the victim when he took control of her car; 2) the court did not err in excluding tape recordings of the victim as the recordings did not contradict the victim's hearsay allegations of abuse; 3) the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow defendant to present expert witness testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness identification; 4) the court did not abuse its discretion denying defendant's motion for a mistrial as the brief mention of the possibility of a polygraph examination did not warrant a mistrial; and 5) the court erroneously admitted certain statements made by the victim's friend and mother, but the error was harmless.    

Read US v. Rodrigeuz-Barrios, No. 07-1854 

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.
Filed July 23, 2009

Before Torruella, Lipez, and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Lipez, Circuit Judge.

For Appellant: G. Richard Strafer.
For Appellee: Vijay Shanker, United States Department of Justice.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard