Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Brooks v. Arthur, 09-1551

By FindLaw Staff on November 19, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Res judicata does not bar plaintiffs' suit against former employer

Brooks v. Arthur, 09-1551, concerned a challenge to the  district court's dismissal of plaintiffs' section 1983 claims in concluding that the doctrine of res judicata barred the claims because the allegations made therein had been resolved administratively, in former correctional officers' suit against their former supervisors, in their individual capacities, asserting retaliation under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. In vacating the judgment, the court remanded the matter in concluding that there was no privity between the Department of Corrections and the defendants in their individual capacities.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard