Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Denial of Applications for Withholding of Removal and Asylum Upheld

By FindLaw Staff on February 24, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Gao v. Holder, No. 07-2070, the court faced a challenge to the BIA's denial of Chinese petitioner's applications for withholding of removal and asylum.

In approving the Attorney General's finding that a conviction for unlawful export is an aggravated felony under section 1231(b)(3)(B), the court stated: "The statute does not declare that some categories of crimes may not be considered particularly serious. Instead, it creates a per se rule that some aggravated felonies must be considered particularly serious and then leaves it up to the Attorney General to 'decide[ ]' whether other crimes are as well."

Thus, in affirming the denial of petitioner's applications based on her conviction for unlawful export, the court ruled that an offense need not be an aggravated felony to qualify as a particularly serious crime for withholding and that BIA may determine that a non-aggravated felony is a particularly serious crime for asylum purposes on a case-by-case determination.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard