Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Muhammad v. Kelly, No. 08-13

By FindLaw Staff on August 07, 2009 5:40 PM

In a capital habeas matter, the denial of the habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) a previously undisclosed ballistics report did not exculpate petitioner, given its inconclusive language; 2) petitioner's counsel did not perform ineffectively by failing to prevent him from representing himself, as he represented himself for only two days during the government's presentation of its case, and his defense attorneys were heavily involved as standby counsel; and 3) petitioner waived his right to present expert mitigation evidence.

Read Muhammad v. Kelly, No. 08-13

Appellate Information

Argued: May 12, 2009

Decided: August 7, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Gregory

Counsel

For Appellant:

Jonathan P. Sheldon, Devine, Connell & Sheldon, PLC, Fairfax, VA

For Appellee:

Katherine Baldwin Burnett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA

Copied to clipboard