Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Ross v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 08-1851

By FindLaw Staff on October 29, 2010 5:06 PM

Plaintiff's suit against WaMu for false reporting of credit information and unfair debt collection practices

Ross v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 08-1851, concerned a challenge to the district court's grant of summary judgment for Washington Mutual (WaMu) in plaintiff's suit against Washington WaMu for false reporting of credit information and unfair debt collection practices.

In affirming, the court held that, because plaintiff filed outside of the Fair Credit Reporting Act's (FCRA) two-year statute of limitations, she lost any FCRA claims she may have had, whatever the merit.  The court also held that plaintiff's state law claims are preempted by 15 U.S.C. section 1681t(b)(1)(F), the FCRA's preemption provision.  Further, although plaintiff argues that her claims are expressly authorized by another FCRA provision, 15 U.S.C. section 1681h(e), she fails to present evidence that WaMu acted with the malice or willful intent to injure necessary to benefit from this section.  Lastly, plaintiff's unfair debt collection practices claim fails because she cannot prove proximate causation, an element of her state law claim.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard