Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

SEC v. Pirate Investor LLC, No. 08-1037

By FindLaw Staff on September 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a securities fraud action, district court's order of disgorgement of appellants' profits from the sales of a stock tip, imposition of civil penalties, and injunction against future violations of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 is affirmed where:  1) the district court correctly found that appellants' conduct constituted a violation of Section 10(b) and thus, appellants cannot avoid application of the statute by invoking constitutional concerns because the text and purpose of the section admit of no exception for disinterested publishers; 2) appellants' First Amendment claim fails as punishing fraud, whether it be common law fraud or securities fraud, simply does not violate the First Amendment; and 3) the injunction does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint because it only enjoins appellants from engaging in securities fraud which is unprotected speech.

Read SEC v. Pirate Investor LLC, No. 08-1037

Appellate Information

Argued: December 2, 2008

Decided: September 15, 2009


Per Curiam Opinion


For Appellant:  Bruce D. Brown, Baker & Hostetler, LLP., of Washington, DC.

For Appellees:  Michael Conley, United States Securities & Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.

Alvaro A. Inigo, Zunka, Milnor, Carter & Ingo, Ltd., Charlottesville, VA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard