Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Smith v. Ozmint, No. 07-6558

By FindLaw Staff on July 31, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action against prison administrators under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) for forcibly shaving plaintiff's head in violation of his religious beliefs, summary judgment for defendants is reversed in part where they failed to meet their burden to show that their policy of forcible grooming was the least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest.

Read Smith v. Ozmint, No. 07-6558

Appellate Information

Argued: May 14, 2009

Decided: July 31, 2009


Opinion by Judge Michael


For Appellant:

Cecily Elizabeth Baskir, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

Steven H. Goldblatt, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

For Appellees:

Andrew Lindemann, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, SC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard