Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Smith v. Smith, No. 08-7139

By FindLaw Staff on December 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit against a prison nurse claiming deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, district court's judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed and remanded where: 1) the inmate made out a claim for a deliberate indifference and the district court erred in finding that he failed to state a claim under the Eighth Amendment; and 2) because the district court premised both the grant of the motion to dismiss and qualified immunity on its finding that plaintiff failed to allege deliberate indifference in his complaint, the immunity analysis was prematurely concluded on the erroneous basis that plaintiff did not plead facts sufficient to indicate defendant had deliberate indifference to his medical need.     

Read Smith v. Smith, No. 08-7139

Appellate Information

Argued: October 27, 2009

Decided: December 28, 2009


Opinion by Circuit Judge  Gregory


For Appellant:  Jamal Malik Edwards, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP

For Appellee:   Samuel F. Arthur, III, Aiken Bridges Nunn Elliott & Tyler, PA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard