Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Suit for Express and Implied Indemnity For FHA & ADA Violations

By FindLaw Staff on April 19, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Archstone Multifamily Series I Trust v. Niles Bolton Assoc., No. 09-1453, the Fourth Circuit faced a challenge to the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant and denial of plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint to include a claim for contribution in a suit for express and implied indemnity, breach of contract and professional negligence, arising from an underlying suit against the parties for FHA and ADA violations in the construction of multi-family housing projects throughout the U.S.

In affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment, the court held that the de facto indemnification state-law claims are preempted under federal law and the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the proposed amendment would be unduly prejudicial to defendant. 

Related Resource:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard