Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Townes v. Jarvis, No. 05-7382

By FindLaw Staff on August 19, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a habeas petition claiming that a parole ineligibility determination violated petitioner's due process and equal protection rights, denial of the petition is affirmed where petitioner did not identify any clearly established federal law that prohibited the parole board from considering conduct unnecessary to a conviction as part of its three-strikes determination.

Read Townes v. Jarvis, No. 05-7382

Appellate Information

Argued: December 3, 2008

Decided: August 19, 2009


Opinion by Judge Motz

Dissent by Judge Shedd


For Appellant:

Justin Sanjeeve Antonipillai, Arnold & Porter, L.L.P., Washington, DC

For Appellees:

Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard