Townes v. Jarvis, No. 05-7382
In a habeas petition claiming that a parole ineligibility determination violated petitioner's due process and equal protection rights, denial of the petition is affirmed where petitioner did not identify any clearly established federal law that prohibited the parole board from considering conduct unnecessary to a conviction as part of its three-strikes determination.
Read Townes v. Jarvis, No. 05-7382
Argued: December 3, 2008
Decided: August 19, 2009
Opinion by Judge Motz
Dissent by Judge Shedd
Justin Sanjeeve Antonipillai, Arnold & Porter, L.L.P., Washington, DC
Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.