Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Comstock, 07-7671

By FindLaw Staff on December 06, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's refusal to order civil commitment under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 reversed

In US v. Comstock, 07-7671, the district court's refusal to order the civil commitment of five individuals under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, is reversed and remanded as, defendants have not met their heavy burden of demonstrating that the "clear and convincing evidence" standard mandated by section 4248 renders the statute unconstitutional on its face, but rather, at the very least, the challenged provision has a plainly legitimate sweep.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard