Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Kelly, No. 08-4982

By FindLaw Staff on January 29, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's convictions for conspiracy to distribute and possess drugs and related crimes is affirmed as the automobile exception does not have any exigency requirement apart form the inherent mobility of the automobile, and thus, if the police have probable cause, the justification to conduct a warrantless search does not vanish once the police have established some degree of control over the automobile. Defendant's remaining claims are rejected as without merit.     

Read US v. Kelly, No. 08-4982

Appellate Information

Argued: December 3, 2009

Decided: January 28, 2010


Opinion by Chief Judge  Wilkinson


For Appellant:  Jon Michael Babineau, Riddick Babineau PC

For Appellee:   Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Office of the US Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard