Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Mehta, No. 08-4489

By FindLaw Staff on February 05, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's conviction and sentence for aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax returns and other crimes is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to prove that the information was transmitted by interstate wire communication in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, thus satisfying each element of the offense; and 2) the district court did not err in calculating the tax loss for sentencing purposes.  

Read US v. Mehta, No. 08-4489

Appellate Information

Argued: October 30, 2009

Decided: February 5, 2010


Opinion by Circuit Judge Shedd


For Appellant:  David Schertler, Schertler & Onorato LLP

For Appellee:   David Ira Salem, Office of the US Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard