Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Morace, No. 09-4007

By FindLaw Staff on February 11, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a conviction of defendant for possession of child pornography, district court's imposition of 5 years of probation and an order to pay a $3000 fine is vacated and remanded as, the court erred by failing to provide an adequate explanation of why a term of imprisonment is not warranted in light of applicable policy statements. 

Read US v. Morace, No. 09-4007

Appellate Information

Argued: December 4, 2009

Decided: February 11, 2010


Opinion by Circuit Judge Shedd


For Appellant:   Joe Exum, Jr., Office of the US Attorney

For Appellee:   Eric Joseph Brignac, Office of the Federal Public Defender

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard