Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Abbott Labs. v. US, No. 09-5014

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a dispute involving a request for a tax refund, Court of Federal Claims' judgment is affirmed where the government's interpretation of the law is entitled to deference as its denial of plaintiff's refund claim on grounds that the assessment period under 26 U.S.C. sec. 6501 had expired was reasonable and not inconsistent with any prior interpretation that was entitled to deference.    

Read Abbott Labs. v. US, No. 09-5014

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 29, 2009

Judges
Before LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by PROST, Circuit Judge.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Thomas V. Linguanti, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Chicago, Illinois.

For Defendant: Francesca U. Tamami, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard